Cost Savings: VisionScan 3D vs. Blue Dye Test

In pharmaceutical manufacturing, product quality and regulatory compliance are essential. Ensuring that pharmaceutical packaging, particularly bottles, is filled accurately and securely is critical, especially in pharmaceuticals and food manufacturing industries. One key aspect of quality control in packaging is leak detection. For years, manufacturers have relied on various methods to detect leaks, with two of the most common being the blue dye test and the newer VisionScan 3D system. While both methods check for leaks in sealed containers, they differ significantly in cost, efficiency, accuracy, and overall impact on production.

This blog explores the cost-saving advantages of adopting VisionScan 3D over the traditional blue dye test method for leak detection in pharmaceutical packaging.

What Is the Blue Dye Test?

The blue dye test has been a staple of leak detection for decades. It’s a relatively simple and cost-effective method in which a blue dye solution is introduced into a container before it is sealed. The container is then submerged in water or exposed to high pressure, and any dye leakage is immediately visible. This visual detection indicates whether the seal is intact.

While the blue dye test is a tried-and-true method, it has a few inherent drawbacks. These include labor costs, the potential for false positives or negatives, limited throughput, and the need for consumables like the dye solution, which must be replaced regularly. Furthermore, the blue dye test requires manual intervention, which can slow down the production line and increase operational costs over time.

What Is the VisionScan 3D?

VisionScan 3D is a cutting-edge, non-destructive leak detection system for high-speed production lines. Using 3D vision technology, VisionScan 3D inspects bottles for leaks with unmatched speed and accuracy. This system can detect even the smallest leaks using highly sensitive, non-contact sensors that create a 3D image of the bottle. It identifies defects such as cracks, damaged seals, or improper closures that could lead to leaks.

One of the primary advantages of the VisionScan 3D system is its ability to perform these checks in real time while the bottles are moving down the production line. The system provides immediate results, allowing for automatic rejection of any faulty bottles without halting production. VisionScan 3D is much faster than the blue dye test and can be integrated seamlessly into high-speed production lines without disrupting workflow.

Various methods of NDT testing outperform traditional, destructive package leak testing methods.

Learn More

Cost Analysis: VisionScan 3D vs. Blue Dye Test

Below, we explain the cost difference between the VisionScan 3D and traditional blue dye test:

Initial Setup Costs

The initial setup costs for any quality control system are an important consideration for pharmaceutical manufacturers. The blue dye test requires minimal upfront investment, as the equipment is simple and the consumables are inexpensive. The primary costs are the labor associated with performing the test, maintaining the equipment, and replacing the dye solution regularly.

In contrast, the VisionScan 3D system requires a higher initial investment due to the sophisticated technology and advanced sensors involved. However, this cost is quickly offset by the long-term savings and efficiency gains that the system provides. The system’s ability to inspect bottles at high speeds without needing to stop the production line makes it an attractive option for manufacturers focused on long-term profitability.

While the initial setup cost of VisionScan 3D may be higher than the blue dye test, it is important to consider the return on investment (ROI). Over time, the VisionScan 3D system will deliver significant cost savings through reduced labor, lower consumables costs, and higher throughput.

Labor Costs

One of the most significant factors contributing to the cost of quality control in packaging is labor. The blue dye test often requires manual intervention, whether for setting up the dye solution, submerging the containers in water, or visually inspecting for leaks. This manual approach leads to longer inspection times and increased labor costs. Depending on the production scale, multiple employees may be needed to conduct the blue dye test, leading to substantial ongoing expenses.

On the other hand, VisionScan 3D automates the leak detection process, reducing or eliminating the need for manual labor. Once the system is set up, it runs autonomously, inspecting bottles in real-time as they move through the production line. This automation allows manufacturers to reallocate staff to other tasks, reducing labor costs and increasing efficiency.

Furthermore, VisionScan 3D’s real-time results mean faulty bottles are immediately rejected from the production line without additional human intervention. This reduces the need for employees to spend time dealing with product defects or addressing bottlenecks in the production process.

Throughput and Efficiency

The speed and efficiency of leak detection are critical factors in reducing production costs. The blue dye test is a time-consuming process that can slow production, especially when large batches of bottles must be tested. The time spent on each test and the necessary manual handling can result in significant delays and lower throughput. As a result, manufacturers may need to run longer shifts or increase the workforce to meet production goals, which add to operational costs.

VisionScan 3D operates at high speeds, inspecting thousands of bottles per hour with minimal downtime. It provides real-time feedback and can detect leaks as the bottles pass through the inspection area. Because the system is fully automated, there is no need to pause the production line for each test, leading to a significant increase in throughput. Manufacturers can produce more units simultaneously, reducing unit costs and improving profitability.

VisionScan 3D’s ability to maintain consistent speed without sacrificing accuracy ensures that the production line operates smoothly and efficiently, without the slowdowns that often come with manual leak detection methods like the blue dye test.

Consumables and Waste

Another factor contributing to the cost of the blue dye test is the need for consumables. The blue dye test relies on a dye solution, which must be purchased and replaced regularly. The dye solution can be costly, and there is always the risk of waste from spillage or rejected bottles due to contamination or minor flaws unrelated to leaks. In addition to the dye, the Blue Dye Test may require other consumables like water for submersion or containers for dye application, adding to the overall expense.

By contrast, VisionScan 3D doesn’t require consumables; it relies on non-contact 3D sensors to detect leaks. Once the system is installed and calibrated, there are no ongoing materials costs, which helps reduce waste and lower long-term expenses. This is particularly advantageous for manufacturers seeking to reduce operational costs over time and minimize their environmental footprint.

Accuracy and Reliability

The accuracy and reliability of a leak detection system directly impact the quality of the final product and the cost of rework or product recalls. The blue dye test is prone to human error. Factors such as inconsistent dye application, incorrect handling, or misinterpreting results can lead to inaccurate readings. This can result in false positives (rejection of good products) or false negatives (letting faulty products pass through), which incur additional costs in terms of waste or customer complaints.

VisionScan 3D, on the other hand, is far more accurate and reliable. The system’s advanced sensors and 3D imaging capabilities allow for precise leak detection with minimal risk of error. By automating the detection process, VisionScan 3D ensures consistency and eliminates the variability introduced by human factors. This leads to fewer rejected bottles, fewer product recalls, and reduced risk of contamination, ultimately saving manufacturers money on rework and improving their bottom line.

Experience the Benefits of the VisionScan 3D With Ascend

While the blue dye test remains popular due to its low initial cost, VisionScan 3D provides substantial long-term savings and efficiency improvements.

At Ascend Packaging, we provide businesses with the VisionScan 3D to test the integrity of blister packs with multiple cavities or pockets. With the VisionScan 3D, you can achieve higher quality standards, reduce product waste, and improve production efficiency—resulting in significant cost savings that extend far beyond the initial purchase price. Contact us today to learn more about the VisionScan 3D.

Cost Savings: VisionScan 3D vs. Blue Dye Test

What Is the Blue Dye Test?

What Is the VisionScan 3D?

Cost Analysis: VisionScan 3D vs. Blue Dye Test

Initial Setup Costs

Labor Costs

Throughput and Efficiency

Consumables and Waste

Accuracy and Reliability

Experience the Benefits of the VisionScan 3D With Ascend

Share This Post

More Like This

The Importance of Seal Integrity Testing

Examining the Costs and Implications of Pharma Packaging Incineration

Explaining the Disadvantages of Blue Dye Tests for Packaging

Vial Leak Tests

Blister Pack Leaks and How To Prevent Them

Different Types of NDT Methods and Solutions

Non-Destructive Leak Testing Offers a Modern Solution

Comply With Seal Integrity Standards Without Destroying Your Products

About Us

Services

Contact Us